MODULE « Reasoning »

Module name :

Reasoning: Evaluate the legal quality of an AI-generated response… step by step.

Module Objective :

The Reasoning module assesses the structural and argumentative quality of a legal text—whether generated by AI or written by a human—using a rigorous and standardized methodology.

‍

Key Features :

Choice of legal text type to analyze :

🧑‍🎓 Practical case
⚖️ Case commentary
📝 Legal memorandum
🤖 Free AI response

‍

Manual or automatic import of texts to analyze

Automatic evaluation of legal reasoning stages

Optional manual grading (for trainers or legal experts)

Comprehensive assessment grid: relevance, clarity, structure, logical flow, and legal accuracy

Export results for audit, training, or AI model comparison

‍

Who Is It For?

Law firms
Universities & law schools
LegalTech companies & AI solution providers
Law students
Legal trainers & educators
Legal & compliance departments

‍

Practical Use Cases :

Benchmarking AI legal models
Checking the legal reliability of automatically generated texts
Training tool for students and junior lawyers
Quality control in professional or ethical contexts
Internal or external audits of AI-based systems

‍

Why This Module Matters ?

AI-generated answers aren’t always wrong… but often poorly structured, lacking reasoning, or misleading in substance.

The Reasoning module helps you:

Detect logical or legal flaws
Compare multiple answers (human or AI)
Ensure the reliability of generated legal content

‍

Available On :

BULORΛ.ai secure portal (token-based access)
Clean & responsive interface
CSV export of results and custom scenarios

‍