MODULE « Legal Source Verification »

Module name

Legal Source Verification

‍

Module Objective

This module analyzes the reliability and legal relevance of AI-generated responses by automatically identifying and classifying cited legal sources — such as laws, case law, doctrine, and regulations.

It also detects inconsistencies related to the selected jurisdiction (e.g., Belgian law vs. French law) and produces a structured, auditable report for immediate verification.

‍

Key Features

In-depth analysis of AI-generated responses

Automatic detection of legal source types:
🏛️ Constitution
📘 Directives
📜 Laws
⚖️ Case law
🏢 Regulations
📚 Doctrine
🧩 Other sources

Jurisdiction-based filtering (France, Belgium, EU, etc.)

Alerts for inconsistent sources within the selected jurisdiction

Clear, exportable reports (.csv) for archiving or justification

Multi-AI testing (ChatGPT, Mistral, Claude, etc.) with one click

Manual mode or import of custom CSV files

‍

Who Is It For?

• Lawyers & legal professionals
• Compliance & risk management departments
• LegalTech companies, Legal Ops teams, and institutions
• Universities, students, and legal researchers
• Public or private organizations operating in regulated environments

‍

Practical Use Cases

• Verification of AI-generated content before publication or decision-making
• Audit of third-party AI tools in sensitive or regulated contexts
• AI-augmented legal education and training
• Benchmarking across multiple AI models

‍

Why This Module Matters

Because AI can “invent” case law or cite the wrong jurisdiction.
This module provides a safety net, an audited memory, and a critical lens on automated legal outputs — ensuring that every legal reference is verifiable and jurisdictionally sound.

‍

Available On

• BULORΛ.ai secure portal (token-based access)
• Intuitive & responsive interface
• CSV export of analyses
• Fully customizable test scenarios

‍

‍

‍