MODULE « A/B »

Module name

A/B Comparator

‍

Module Objective

This module allows you to compare two artificial intelligence models on the same question using a structured table, an automatic or manual evaluation, and a document export system.
It provides an objective, reproducible framework to assess and benchmark AI models in professional or academic contexts.

‍

Key Features

In-depth analysis of AI-generated responses

Side-by-side display of both answers

Option to enter a prompt manually or import a .csv file

Automatic evaluation based on objective criteria:
– Relevance of the response
– Clarity of reasoning
– Quality of argumentation
– Logical structure

Clear, exportable report (.csv) for archiving or justification

Multi-AI testing (ChatGPT, Mistral, Claude, etc.) in one click

Manual or hybrid mode with custom CSV imports

‍

Who Is It For?

• Lawyers & legal professionals (quality verification of legal AIs)
• Compliance & risk departments (tool evaluation before deployment)
• LegalTechs & Legal Ops (AI benchmarking)
• Private-sector companies
• Trainers & universities (educational tool for critical reasoning analysis)
• Public or regulated institutions
• Procurement & IT departments (AI vendor comparison)

Practical Use Cases

• Compare GPT-4 and Claude on ten sensitive legal questions to choose a decision-support tool
• Train law students to analyze AI reasoning in private law
• Justify the rejection of an AI solution during a quality or GDPR audit
• Build documentary evidence in case of dispute over AI misuse

‍

Why Choose This Module

Because asking a single question to an AI is not enough.
You must compare, evaluate, and decide.

This module serves as a bridge between innovation and governance, and between automation and rigor.

‍

Security & Traceability

• BULORΛ.ai secure portal (token-based access)
• Comparison history available
• CSV export of analyses
• No data sharing between users
• Enterprise option: full auditability for legal or consulting professionals

‍

‍

‍